NPR Bias...

NPR has been all over the news the last few weeks. This is mostly because of the current House of Representatives are suggesting that we defund NPR altogether. Sure, they get less than 3% of their money from the federal government, but the principle is that we as taxpayers shouldn't be forced to support a news station that doesn't represent all viewpoints. In voicing my support for this defunding, I was asked by a dear friend to provide proof that they provide an unbalanced view. So, here we go.
Most don't know this, but I spent the first year and a half of my married life as a data entry specialist. This means that I spent my entire work day doing nothing but mindless typing, which allowed me to listen to anything I wanted. And what did I listen to? Mostly NPR. I was not in a position in the building that I couldn't get AM stations, and I despised the radio stations in Tucson. So, I listened to NPR the majority of the time at work.
I can safely say that Morning Edition and All Things Considered are pretty standard news broadcasts. But, in between are almost all editorial shows. And they aren't balanced editorial shows either. Talk of the Nation (now called the politically correct term 'Talk of the World') is hosted by a blatantly liberal host. He never gave Bush a fair shake, always stating his opinion as fact. Then there is Fresh Air. The host had many anti-religion and even anti-Mormon guests on, without ever ONCE having an apologist to Mormonism on. I can give specific examples and dates if the reader would like them.
So, It's not that I mind that people have opinions. In fact, I love good debate! But, that's not what NPR represents. During the 2008 primary season they had ONE Republican candidate on, whereas they had almost all of the Democratic candidates. You call that balanced? No! It's editorialized journalism. They don't deserve a penny of MY money. If they would even try to be balanced, I would be a little more sympathetic.

Subway versus Jimmy John's...Fight!

I have purchased food from both places within the last week and I will tell you my experience with both.

Service: They are almost always kinder at Jimmy John's. And the funny thing is that most of the employees seem to be enjoying themselves, which makes a person ordering food happier as well.

Speed of food deliverance: I'm talking about how quick from ordering your food to when you get it. Subway really should high some efficiency consultants. It is awful there! There were only two people in front of me, and it still took almost ten minutes from when I walked in to when I got my food. Contrast with Jimmy's: I walked in, put in my order, sat down to write a text, and then my food was ready! Not to mention how quick Jimmy John's is at to-your-door delivery, which is something that subway will never do.

Quality of food: no comparison. Jimmy John's wins out every time! It just tastes and feels more fresh.

Price: The price is a little better at Subway, but not by much.

Overall: No comparison. I would MUCH rather spend an extra dollar for a better sandwich, better service, and faster service.